This paper argues that cyberspace is not an immaterial elsewhere but a geopolitical infrastructure built upon shared imaginaries, control, power, and conflict. Emerging in the strategic literature as the fifth dimension of power and conflict, cyberspace interweaves technical-political materiality with symbolic imaginaries, from physical circuits to global platforms, constituting a digital and spatial configuration where polities (states, actors) and corporations compete for authority and strategic advantage. The paper reconstructs the debate on the semantic density of cyberspace, tracing its genealogies from the political lexicons of the imaginary to institutional and theoretical definitions (technological, politico-philosophical, and strategic) in order to show that, although volatile and partially intangible, cyberspace is not immaterial or external, but fundamentally political and constituted by forces, actors, and socio-technical, legal, and governmental entanglements. The analysis proceeds through three movements: (I) tracing cyberspace’s genealogy from cyberpunk literature to its institutional and disciplinary definitions, revealing the latent political dimension within imaginative lexicons; (II) employing conceptual clarification to eliminate pernicious definitional ambiguities whilst comparing how different technological configurations and political visions shape distinct understandings of cyberspace; (III) examining cyberspace as an eminently political space through the lenses of governmentality and strategic studies, positioning it as both a domain of asymmetric struggle and a fragile terrain of potential autonomy.

Cyberspazio come dimensione politica. Origini, definizioni, trame socio-tecnologiche

Barbara Henry;Ilaria Santoemma
2026-01-01

Abstract

This paper argues that cyberspace is not an immaterial elsewhere but a geopolitical infrastructure built upon shared imaginaries, control, power, and conflict. Emerging in the strategic literature as the fifth dimension of power and conflict, cyberspace interweaves technical-political materiality with symbolic imaginaries, from physical circuits to global platforms, constituting a digital and spatial configuration where polities (states, actors) and corporations compete for authority and strategic advantage. The paper reconstructs the debate on the semantic density of cyberspace, tracing its genealogies from the political lexicons of the imaginary to institutional and theoretical definitions (technological, politico-philosophical, and strategic) in order to show that, although volatile and partially intangible, cyberspace is not immaterial or external, but fundamentally political and constituted by forces, actors, and socio-technical, legal, and governmental entanglements. The analysis proceeds through three movements: (I) tracing cyberspace’s genealogy from cyberpunk literature to its institutional and disciplinary definitions, revealing the latent political dimension within imaginative lexicons; (II) employing conceptual clarification to eliminate pernicious definitional ambiguities whilst comparing how different technological configurations and political visions shape distinct understandings of cyberspace; (III) examining cyberspace as an eminently political space through the lenses of governmentality and strategic studies, positioning it as both a domain of asymmetric struggle and a fragile terrain of potential autonomy.
2026
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Henry-Santoemma, Cyberspazio come dimensione politica.pdf

embargo fino al 12/03/2028

Tipologia: PDF Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 286.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
286.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/590613
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
social impact