Purpose: This commentary discusses the AVI/LVGLS ratio as an emerging, fully non-invasive marker of ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) for refining cardiovascular risk assessment in hypertension beyond conventional indices such as left ventricular ejection fraction and Ea/Ees. Methods: We critically appraised the study by Zhang et al., which evaluated the association between the arterial velocity-pulse index to left ventricular global longitudinal strain ratio and estimated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in hypertensive patients. The commentary integrates these findings with prior evidence on arterial stiffness, myocardial deformation, and VAC assessment. Results: Zhang et al. showed that AVI/LVGLS differed significantly between hypertensive patients and normotensive controls and was independently associated with elevated estimated 10-year ASCVD risk. An AVI/LVGLS ratio below the fifth percentile predicted high ASCVD risk after multivariable adjustment, while the composite index demonstrated better discrimination than AVI, LVGLS, or conventional ventricular–vascular index alone. These findings support the incremental value of combining vascular load and myocardial deformation into a single echocardiography-compatible parameter. Conclusion: AVI/LVGLS may provide a practical bridge between vascular and myocardial phenotyping in hypertension, offering a sensitive marker of maladaptive VAC and subclinical cardiovascular risk. Prospective, multicenter validation is required before implementation in routine risk stratification or therapeutic monitoring.

Moving the Goalposts in Hypertensive Risk Assessment: The AVI/LVGLS Ratio as a Sensitive Detector of Maladaptive Ventricular-Arterial Coupling

Trimarchi, Giancarlo
;
Pizzino, Fausto;Mariani, Massimiliano
2026-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: This commentary discusses the AVI/LVGLS ratio as an emerging, fully non-invasive marker of ventricular–arterial coupling (VAC) for refining cardiovascular risk assessment in hypertension beyond conventional indices such as left ventricular ejection fraction and Ea/Ees. Methods: We critically appraised the study by Zhang et al., which evaluated the association between the arterial velocity-pulse index to left ventricular global longitudinal strain ratio and estimated 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk in hypertensive patients. The commentary integrates these findings with prior evidence on arterial stiffness, myocardial deformation, and VAC assessment. Results: Zhang et al. showed that AVI/LVGLS differed significantly between hypertensive patients and normotensive controls and was independently associated with elevated estimated 10-year ASCVD risk. An AVI/LVGLS ratio below the fifth percentile predicted high ASCVD risk after multivariable adjustment, while the composite index demonstrated better discrimination than AVI, LVGLS, or conventional ventricular–vascular index alone. These findings support the incremental value of combining vascular load and myocardial deformation into a single echocardiography-compatible parameter. Conclusion: AVI/LVGLS may provide a practical bridge between vascular and myocardial phenotyping in hypertension, offering a sensitive marker of maladaptive VAC and subclinical cardiovascular risk. Prospective, multicenter validation is required before implementation in routine risk stratification or therapeutic monitoring.
2026
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
53. Moving the Goalposts in Hypertensive Risk Assessment.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print/Submitted manuscript
Licenza: Creative commons (selezionare)
Dimensione 311.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
311.38 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11382/590472
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
social impact